Home Feature Dispelling the Myths of the Habs Language Debate

Dispelling the Myths of the Habs Language Debate

15
Dispelling the Myths of the Habs Language Debate

Written by Rick Stephens, AllHabs.net

MONTREAL, QC. — A small protest by language militants in front of the Bell Centre and an apology from Canadiens general manager Pierre Gauthier last week once again focused attention on the hiring policy of the Montreal Canadiens.

“I’m sorry if we upset people because that certainly wasn’t our intention. What will happen in the future, at the end of the season, is that we will re-evaluate the whole file. As (owner Geoff) Molson said in his communique a week ago, it’s very important to us that our head coach be bilingual. So that will be part of our decision at that point.” — Pierre Gauthier

Gauthier and Molson both stated the importance of the head coach being bilingual. This begs the simple question, Why? Of all the characteristics required to be successful in the NHL, why is language so important?

When Gauthier appointed Randy Cunneyworth as interim head coach of the Canadiens, there were many critics in the media including Luc Gelinas from RDS.

[blackbirdpie url=”https://twitter.com/#!/LucGelinas/status/148077174270853121″]

Gelinas expressed his disappointment that owner Geoff Molson had allowed his general manager to hire Cunneyworth. He called the new head coach “Gauthier’s mistake.”

I had the opportunity to ask Gelinas to point to the deficits in Cunneyworth’s resume that make him a hiring mistake. Gelinas replied, “Not his resume. He deserved a chance in the NHL. But, I still believe the head coach in Mtl needs to speaks both languages.”

Gelinas confirmed to me that nothing in Cunneyworth’s skills and experience disqualify him from being a NHL head coach. In his opinion, Cunneyworth is perfectly qualified to coach any of the 29 teams in the NHL, just not the Montreal Canadiens.

Well, isn’t that interesting?

It’s accurate to say that speaking French has nothing to do with the skills required to direct the on-ice performance of the Canadiens hockey team or any other in the NHL, yet it is being held up as an impediment to employment for Cunneyworth. Imagine being told that you were qualified to manage any of your company’s franchise offices, but not the one in Calgary because you don’t play the cello.

There is a typical response to this.

“Fans in Quebec want to hear the coach address them in their own language.”

The statement dredges up images of the family listening to hockey on the radio while gathered around the oil-burning stove in small towns like Sainte-Justine, Quebec. Fans just can’t wait til the end of the game when Jacques Martin will speak directly to them. Really?

This is a romanticized description that simply isn’t valid anymore, if it ever was. The insistence that the coach be able to speak directly to francophone fans is a red herring.

The Canadiens head coach speaks to the media after every game for 7-10 minutes, about half in English and half in French. So the notion that being able to speak French for 3-5 minutes, 82 times a year is the most important hiring characteristic is ludicrous.

Besides, any fan knows that nothing of substance is said in those pressers. During coach Martin’s reign, he delivered the same broken record every night speaking about the compete level, playing without the puck, and mistakes of the youth.

CBC’s George Stroumboulopoulos went one further suggesting that children in Montreal Children’s and Sainte-Justine Hospitals want to hear the coach speak French during the annual visit in December. Sorry George, the coach doesn’t accompany the players. Besides, the children are far more interested in meeting Carey Price, Brian Gionta, P.K. Subban, Andrei Kostitsyn and Josh Gorges — the communication on the hospital visits between the players and the kids transcends any language barrier.

Listen, we are the first to recognize that hockey fans want to read about the Montreal Canadiens in the language of their choice. All Habs Hockey Magazine publishes original content about the Habs in French and English. It is our commitment to you to provide diversity of perspective and language.

But it doesn’t stop there. In addition to English and French, All Habs publishes in Spanish and Brazilian Portuguese. We recognize that Canadiens fans are found not only in Canada and the U.S. but across the planet — and we have added talented staff who can deliver features, analysis, and creative insight in four languages.

No other website can offer that to it’s readers. But we see it as OUR role. It’s unfortunate that the mainstream media don’t offer a similar level of service to their readers and viewers instead demanding that an NHL coach must also act as a translator for them.

“So you are saying it’s okay for the Toronto Maple Leafs to hire a unilingual French or Russian coach?”

This silly question is better suited for discussion at a junior debate club in high school. It is most often asked by a person with little or no knowledge of sports and coaching.
The most important task of the coach is the ability to communicate with his players. Given that the language of the NHL is English, it is possible to be a unilingual English coach but impossible if the coach speaks another language.

The problem with the Montreal Canadiens hiring policy is that in the past they have valued language over communication skills. As a result the last two coaches, Jacques Martin and Guy Carbonneau, have been bilingual, but haven’t been able to communicate with players in either language. It was a major barrier leading to their dismissal.

“I want the coach to be like me so I can be proud of him.”

For the sake of argument, let’s agree with this statement. Once that is done it all comes down to the definition of what “like me” is. For the small-minded extremists like the ones who were protesting in front of the Bell Centre and who wish to live in an insular society, this doesn’t leave many choices.

When this question comes up, I think about the 2010 Winter Olympics in Vancouver. I believe that Kevin Martin is like me, and I was proud of him. Alex Bilodeau is like me too — he won gold and I was very proud of him.

Eric Staal is like me, we grew up in the same home-town. I was proud of him but just as proud of Jonathan Toews, Patrick Marleau, and Rick Nash.

In fact my definition of “like me” is so broad and inclusive, that I was proud of Kaillie Humphries, Charles Hamelin, Tessa Bonhomme, Ashleigh McIvor, Caroline Ouellette, Catherine Ward, Maëlle Ricker, Tessa Virtue and Scott Moir. They are all Canadians — just like me — and I was thrilled for each of them when I heard the anthem play and watched them presented with their medals.

The same sentiment should apply for fans of the Canadiens — pride for the success of players and coaches shouldn’t only be restricted to those who originate from the home province.

“If the Canadiens don’t hire francophone coaches, who will?”

This is perhaps the most disturbing question of the lot most often voiced by members of the francophone media. It suggests that francophone coaches are inferior in some way so need a token hiring by the Canadiens to gain entry into the NHL.

It is a bigoted statement and patently untrue. There are some good coaches who are bilingual — but because of demographics, there are far too few.
Besides, the statement makes the warped assumption that the Montreal Canadiens, should sacrifice quality and accept their role as the affirmative action employer of the NHL. That’s absurd!

The NHL will always find talent. If WJC gold-medal winner Max Friberg can be noticed in the small community of Skövde, Sweden by scouts of the Anaheim Ducks, then a dynamic coach like Guy Boucher would have been discovered in Drummondville, Quebec even if the Canadiens hadn’t brought him into their organization.

“If they just make an effort to speak French, everyone will appreciate it.”

There is some truth to this statement.  Randy Cunneyworth has taken to beginning his press conferences with some variation of “Je suis très content.” The gesture, while appreciated, still won’t garner media support for turning his interim title into permanent one.

Just ask Scott Gomez.  The Canadiens center was applauded by fans and media for committing to Berlitz classes shortly after arriving in Montreal.  But even language lessons won’t buy favors when the performance slides — Gomez is presently public enemy No. 1 in Montreal.

No one tried harder than Tom Kostopoulos.  He took every opportunity to speak French using what he learned in high school yet his language skills were often mocked by the media after they completed an interview with him.  Let’s not forget Michel Beaudry’s on-air bigoted rant against Kostopoulos on 110% that ended with “Tom Kosto-f**king-poulos!”

I support the notion that the coach should be able to master greetings and common phrases in French. But conducting a press conference fluently is an entirely different matter.  NHL level hockey is a complicated game — do fans want the coach of their team spending time with Rosetta Stone or breaking down opposition video and developing winning game plans?

“But you don’t understand, the Canadiens are more than just a hockey team, they are an icon for the preservation of language and culture. They are a religion in Quebec!”

I live in Montreal, and I have closely followed the Canadiens for my entire life. I get it — I do understand their position in the province.

There is no doubt that the Habs have an extremely passionate and devoted fanbase. But it’s also true that any number of causes latch on to the popularity of the Canadiens to get their message out. One opportunistic politician uses social media to raise his profile by exploiting the Habs.

But the modern reality is that the Habs are no longer the exclusive domain of Quebeckers. The club has passionate fans who come out in droves when the Canadiens take to the road to play at any of the other 29 arenas in the league.

And it doesn’t stop there. Canadiens fans can be found all over the world. No one can deny their commitment to the team as they follow their team via internet streams at all hours of the day and night.

One must ask, why are the Canadiens so popular? It may have something to do with 24 Stanley Cups. They earned championships by acquiring the best talent, both on the ice and behind the bench.

When the topic turns to past coaches, discussion focuses on Scotty Bowman, the most successful bench boss in Canadiens history. Debate often devolves into how fluent he was in French. Frankly, it’s irrelevant.

It’s simple. Bowman was hired because he was the best coach in the NHL. The Canadiens haven’t been able to make the claim that they have one of the best coaches in the league in more than 30 years. In the past 15 years, they have employed some of the worst.

So the simple truth is that to maintain their position in Quebec as a icon, the organization has to stop trying to be all things to all people. The Montreal Canadiens must return to a winning tradition and to do everything possible to hire the best coach available.

“I think having a bilingual coach and general manager is important in Quebec.”

So do the Montreal Canadiens. It was articulated by former President Pierre Boivin who said, “You bet [bilingualism] is important. It’s our mission. There’s no question about it. We operate in the province of Quebec, two-thirds to three-quarters of our fans and clients are Francophones.”

At the time, Mr. Boivin conveniently forgot about the millions of Canadiens fans outside of Quebec, who follow the team religiously, order NHL Game Center, buy merchandise, and make pilgrimages to Montreal to see their team live.

But is the policy that has been in use since the mid-90’s hurting the team’s ability to win?

In addition to confirming the importance of bilingualism, Boivin said the Canadiens management hiring policy makes the club “severely competitively disadvantaged.”

“So [other NHL teams] have a pool of 90, (even if) not all are good or are available. We have a pool of three, four, five maybe? Sometimes none? It’s the same thing with coaches. And that’s a huge disadvantage when human capital is your most important asset.” — Pierre Boivin

There is no question that making language the top criteria for hiring severely limits the pool of candidates which negatively affects the quality of the appointee.

Do the Canadiens really want to come clean with their supporters that winning is not the top priority of the team?  Or is it time for the organizational goals of the team to be stripped down. Imagine how true Canadiens fans would react to hearing Geoff Molson publicly commit to one simple goal:

Our mission is to win the Stanley Cup | Notre mission est de remporter la Coupe Stanley | Nossa missão é ganhar a Stanley Cup | Nuestra misión es ganar la Stanley Cup

Those are messages that would be embraced by Habs fans everywhere.

15 COMMENTS

  1. As a French speaking Habs fan I want my team to win. Pure and simple. Bonus points if they can hire as many francophones as possible, be it in the front office or for the on ice personnel. (Also, I see it as more than a very nice gesture when non-francophones make an effort to learn the language and immerse themselves in our culture.) However, it shouldn’t be done at the price of forsaking opportunities in hiring the best available.

    As I was exchanging opinions yesterday with another francophone who doesn’t exactly share my personal views on this particular topic, we all want to better our team and some of our grievances are common. Among them: we prefer the show on ice to be an exciting one to that of sleep inducing hockey, and this is something that Cunneyworth seems to be providing much more than Martin, at least as of now. Hindsight being what it is, Claude Giroux having been snubbed in favor of David Fischer in the 2006 draft hurts as much to non French speaking fans as to the pure laine. Reversely, I remember the RDS staff complaining about drafting Brendan Gallagher (who’s the WHL pick of the week, following a brilliant showing at the WHJC) in the 2010 draft over some Québécois player whose name I’ve forgotten. But it will always be easier to point out a person’s origins than to evaluate competence or potential.

    However, when I read that for some (Québécois actor Emmanuel Bilodeau, to name one), winning games and even the Stanley Cup should take a backseat to the identity of the team, this leaves me speechless. NHL hockey might be a show but it is one based on competition (not like theatrical arts), the goal is therefore winning.

    Of course, a team that hasn’t won for so long will attract its share of criticism, and the language issue will only add up to it much as Gomez’s salary.

    At any rate, some people will never be satisfied. Like Stephane Laporte who says Cunneyworth’s few French clips amount as “too little too late”. The same way that drafting Louis Leblanc was seen as a gimmick to please the pure laine masses. Again, overplaying Mathieu Darche could be seen as one other gimmick of the type but actually I’d rather blame Jacques Martin for that one — too bad Martin happens to be bilingual, it is just an unfortunate coincidence.

    Oh, and this beauty from a 16 year old protester who believes the coach should be an example to follow for our youth, as far as French speaking is concerned. As a mother, I’m very proud of the way my son expresses himself in French in spite of the education system he was exposed to. Then again, maybe I should be thankful he was never a great amateur of our sport national.

    • Very good and balanced points Lyse. The draft always offers fodder for those who want to play politics. Fischer over Giroux is commonly tossed out, but less so is selecting Lapierre over Howard and All-Stars Backes and Byfuglien. Gainey and Timmins don’t get enough credit for selecting Price when the masses were screaming for Pouliot or Brule. Leblanc will be interesting to watch — did the Habs make a wise choice passing on the big, skilled center that they have coveted for so long in Kreider.

      But the main thrust of your argument is that you want the Habs to win — it is the overriding wish by the vast majority of Canadiens fans.

  2. I am not disagreeing with the overall thesis, but to say that Bowman was simply hired because he was the best coach in the NHL really seems to oversimplify his hiring (and also his exodus).

    There’s a myriad of reasons why Bowman was a great coaching selection for the Canadiens. He had worked with Pollock, he had worked in the Canadiens organization, he was familiar with players in the organization, he had experience, he was familiar (obviously) with the city and he was a great judge of talent.

    There’s not a simple formula for being a successful coach in Montreal. I don’t think Dan Bylsma would have the same success in Montreal that he has enjoyed in Pittsburgh. Mike Babcock, on the other hand, might be able to translate his success to Montreal.

    Bob Berry is a great example of a successful coach who wasn’t able to bring that same success to Montreal. He believed that coaching in LA would be the same as coaching in Montreal. It wasn’t.

    The number one consideration for hiring a coach shouldn’t be bilingualism, but at the same time becoming a winning coach in Montreal isn’t a simple formula. A holistic approach to judging criteria should be taken in for selecting a coach the Canadiens.

    Bowman wasn’t hired because he was the best coach in the NHL, he was hired because he was the best coach for Montreal. I know that seems like nit picking, but I really think there is a massive difference.

    Great article. It was very balanced.

    • I agree that their is a difference between being the best coach and the best coach for a particular situation. I always thought that Martin was an okay coach, just the wrong coach for this team at this time.

      But Bowman wasn’t the best coach in the NHL at the time? By what standard?

      Scotty Bowman took St Louis one of the first expansion teams from the first round of NHL expansion in 1967 to the Stanley Cup Finals in each of their first three years of existence. While there is a rarely an objective answer to a question like “best coach in the NHL” that pretty much speaks for itself

      • I agree with both neumann103 and MarkBlack that among the best coaches in the league, some are better suited to certain teams than others. I’ll even agree with MarkBlack that Scotty Bowman was a good match with the Canadiens as well as being one of the best coaches at the time, and all-time. But detailing the reasons for Bowman’s success was not the point of this piece.

        The formula is not simple to finding a successful coach for the Montreal Canadiens, but it starts with a search that includes the very best coaches in the game today, including Babcock, Bylsma, Ruff and others. Then it can be narrowed down to find the best fit for the assets on the roster and the rest of the management team. The point of that particular section of the article is the process that I just described hasn’t happened in Montreal in a very, very long time. Fishing in the shallow part of the pond means that the Habs have to win the lottery. And it’s clear that they haven’t.

        If the Canadiens want to once again raise the Cup and quit resting on their past glories, they must attract the best talent — that includes at the head coach and general manager level. As long as they follow the policy of letting language trump all other criteria, they will continue to be “severely competitively disadvantaged.”

      • Reread what I wrote. I never said that Bowman wasn’t the best coach in the NHL, I disagreed with the reasons for why Bowman was hired and why he made a good fit with the Canadiens.

        I am not disagreeing that Bowman was the best coach at the time, my point was simply that success elsewhere doesn’t always translate to success in Montreal. Bowman’s case was pretty unique in that he had a previous relationship with the franchise and the city.

      • “Scotty Bowman took St Louis one of the first expansion teams from the first round of NHL expansion in 1967 to the Stanley Cup Finals in each of their first three years of existence.”

        Just want to preface by saying while I agree that Bowman should be considered as among the best; that Blues fact should hardly be considered as supporting that argument. The Blues got in the Finals simply because one of those expansion clubs (who were all put in one division) were *GUARANTEED* to make the finals for a number of years.

  3. Perhaps the most coherent, succinct and well explained piece on the language debate I have read in the last two months. Bravo.

  4. You obviously represent all that is wrong with our education system. You need to get back to school, mais il est trop tard. Usted no es bastante intelligent.

    • And this is the best that the language militants have to offer. With such compelling logic, in three languages no less, it’s hard to figure out why only 100 protesters came out to support the cause.

    • VJ Singh, there is plenty wrong with your fascist education system that empowers language monitors to patrol the school playgrounds, “tapping” young children on the shoulders to discourage any spoken language but French. In another time and place, the advice of the ‘monitors’ was probably similar: “Englisch ist verboten!”

      Keep up the great work, Rick.

  5. As one of the “millions of Canadiens fans outside of Quebec”, thanks for saying what so few have the courage to say.

    Brilliant article.

  6. TOE BLAKE is the most successful coach in Canadiens history, not Scottie Bowman, Blake coached the Canadiens for 13 years, winning eight Stanley Cups—the most for any coach in the team’s history and second in the NHL, only behind Bowman’s nine, which he won with the Canadiens, Penquins & Red Wings. He is still the winningest coach in Canadiens’ history…oh, an ANGLO.

Comments are closed.